Key Takeaways
- NFTs are protected by copyright law, and infringers will be held liable.
- The fair use defense does not apply to the unauthorized reproduction of NFTs that are substantially similar to the original.
- Cybersquatting, the practice of registering domain names that are confusingly similar to trademarks, is illegal and will result in damages.
In a landmark decision, a U.S. District Court Judge has ruled in favor of Yuga Labs, the creators of the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT collection, awarding them $1.57 million in damages and disgorgement against Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen for copyright infringement and cybersquatting.
Ripping Off the Bored Apes: A Tale of Copyright Infringement
The saga began when Ripps and Cahen, two self-proclaimed “conceptual artists,” decided to create their own version of the wildly popular BAYC NFTs, calling them “RR/BAYC” and “BAYC V2.” These copycat NFTs were strikingly similar to the original BAYC designs, featuring the same cartoonish apes with various accessories and traits. However, Ripps and Cahen claimed their creations were merely parodies, protected by the fair use doctrine.
Judge Rejects Fair Use Defense, Upholds Copyright
The court, however, disagreed. Judge John Walter found that Ripps and Cahen’s use of BAYC’s design was not transformative enough to qualify as a parody. He noted that the defendants’ NFTs were “substantially similar” to the original BAYC NFTs and that they were likely to cause confusion among consumers. The judge also rejected the defendants’ argument that their use of BAYC’s design was protected by the fair use doctrine, finding that their use was not for criticism, comment, or news reporting.
Cybersquatting: Domain Names and Digital Deception
In addition to copyright infringement, the court also found Ripps and Cahen liable for cybersquatting. Cybersquatting is the practice of registering domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to trademarks or other intellectual property rights, with the intent to profit from the confusion. In this case, the defendants registered the domain name “boredapeclub.com,” which is nearly identical to Yuga Labs’ domain name, “boredapeyachtclub.com.” The court found that the defendants’ use of this domain name was intended to deceive consumers into believing that their website was affiliated with Yuga Labs.
Victory for Yuga Labs, Precedent for NFT Copyright Protection
The court’s decision is a significant victory for Yuga Labs and sets a precedent for copyright protection in the NFT space. The ruling sends a clear message that NFTs are protected by copyright law and that those who infringe on these rights will be held accountable. The decision also provides much-needed clarity for NFT creators and collectors, who have been grappling with the legal uncertainties surrounding NFTs.
Bonus: The Future of NFT Copyright: The Yuga Labs victory is a positive step towards establishing clear copyright guidelines in the NFT space. However, as the NFT market continues to evolve, new challenges and complexities will likely arise. One potential area of concern is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate NFTs. As AI-generated NFTs become more sophisticated, it will be important to determine how copyright law applies to these creations.
Another challenge is the international nature of the NFT market. NFTs can be bought and sold by people all over the world, making it difficult to enforce copyright laws across different jurisdictions. As the NFT market becomes more global, it will be important to develop international agreements and standards for NFT copyright protection.
Despite these challenges, the Yuga Labs victory is a significant step forward for the NFT industry. It provides much-needed clarity for NFT creators and collectors and sets a precedent for copyright protection in the digital art world.
Leave a Reply